Category

Business Strategy

Boards Not Thrilled With CIOs

By IT Strategy No Comments

According to a survey conducted by the National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD) and reported by CIO Magazine, many board members are dissatisfied with quality of information they get from their CIOs. Directors want the CIO to give them more and better information, especially about IT risk.

According to the report, only 13% of board directors are satisfied with IT briefings. About 35% said they were unsatisfied with the quality of technical information and 27% were unsatisfied with its quality.

This survey highlights that despite so many surveys, discussions and articles, there is often a discrepancy between the business perspective of the board and the role it sees IT is serving in the organization. IT management needs to demonstrate deep understanding of the business and define its role in terms that go beyond keeping the servers humming and provisioning software and mobile devices. As enterprises explore new technologies and business opportunities in cloud computing, social media and big data analytics, IT leadership has an excellent opportunity to deliver significant new business value.

The burden does not lie exclusively on the shoulders of the CIO. Corporate boards must include the CIO in devising a robust strategy and implementation roadmap of these new technologies. The potential complexity and the nascent nature of many of the new overly-hyped technologies require that the CIO organization is involved throughout in order to reduce both technology and business risks.

As the report shows, the main chasm between the board and the CIO is exactly in these areas: technology and risk. It’s time the two organizations start working together.

 

I-Cubed Acquires Akoya, Adds Cost Analytics Capabilities

By IT Strategy, Manufacturing, Mergers & Acquisitions, PLM One Comment

Cost Analytics Helps Getting More From PLM Data

I-Cubed, a product lifecycle management (PLM) and data migration services company headquartered in Raleigh, NC, announced today the acquisition of Akoya, a provider of cost analytics and supply chain optimization software for an undisclosed sum (both companies are privately held).

Akoya, based in Chicago, provides patented product cost analytics software that helps manufacturers reduce product cost and optimize purchasing and inventory decisions. Akoya’s analytic software uses 3D CAD information coupled with extensive financial and purchasing data to estimate parts cost and identify cost-savings opportunities before the design is frozen.

The software helps manufacturers make smart design/cost tradeoff decisions, reduce product costs by identifying pricing inefficiencies in the suppliers’ network, improve accuracy of manufacturing quotes, and similar manufacturing and supply chain related decisions.

Most manufacturing companies undertake periodic cost optimization and supplier rationalization efforts. These business-critical activities tend to use manual processes using financial, quality and supplier information, typically involving multitude of spreadsheets and data sources. Although the analysts performing these tasks are very experienced, manufacturers find it increasingly difficult to apply the cost optimization process consistently throughout  the elongated and fragmented supply chains of the global economy. Furthermore, as the experienced workforce is slowly retiring, manufacturing companies will have to rely on analytic and decision support tools to replace some of the diminishing expertise.

Akoya offers a good mix of packaged analytic tools, access to raw material information and historical cost data, and high level of manufacturing and supply chain expertise. The process of tapping into a manufacturing company product development process and supply chain planning is highly consultative, and requires deep understanding of CAD model data and the PLM/PDM tools that manage it, which is I-Cubed’s core expertise.

Through the acquisition, Akoya will get the necessary resources and experience to grow its business from the small initial base of a handful of customers that include Caterpillar, John Deere and American Axle. Akoya’s customers should expect to get an experienced resource-rich company that will not only scale as needed, but can also offer additional product management and software integration services.

The acquisition is a logical expansion of I-Cubed’s PLM-related service offerings. The company currently provides an array of services focusing on product data quality, especially for PLM software upgrades and migration, and the additional analytic capabilities from Akoya will give existing and new customers a richer set of product data related services.

 

How To Win Without Differentiation

By IT Strategy No Comments

All companies are trying to differentiate their products and services from those of the competition. They believe that strong differentiation is a necessary part of the business strategy to create and grow a market, because, the logic goes, if their products or services are just like the competitors’, why would the customer buy from them? How will they attract and retain buyers?

I am frequently asked to provide market assessments, conduct SWOT analyses and help companies formulate a go-to-market strategy that would differentiate their product or service offering from the competitors and tell it in a credible and compelling way. The problem is that many companies do more or less the same thing, the same way, in the same market, and that they are unable to credibly differentiate their offerings from other companies.

In an HBR article titled You Can Win Without Differentiation, Freek Vermeulen discusses the question of differentiation. Vermeulen argues that when companies are unable to differentiate their offerings effectively, the only option they have is to drop prices and hope to make up some of the loss by increased sales volume, a tactic that is easy for the competition to match. While both consumers and suppliers are very sensitive to pricing, a differentiation and competitiveness strategy based on price alone is fragile, especially when there is ample supply of competitors and substitutes. In this kind of zero-sum competitive game, the ultimate winner of price wars is the consumer.

I believe there are other options for product companies to consider before lowering prices and engage in fierce price competition. For instance, product companies should certainly compete on quality, warranty coverage, delivery terms and service levels. In this type of differentiation, the buyer can make a reasonable comparison between features, functionality, warranty terms and pricing.

However, if you sell services rather than products, this is not as straightforward. Vermeulen uses the example of management consulting firms, such as McKinsey and Accenture, where there is no simple and obvious way to articulate and differentiate their capabilities and make a succinct, credible and reliable connection between capabilities and business outcome. Furthermore, the skills, capabilities and services these firms sell are common commodities across the industry and therefore do not form an effective barrier to entry.

DifferentiationWhen value differentiation is too vague and difficult to demonstrate, price competitiveness does not work. Potential buyers seek other ways to drive their decisions, and, as Vermeulen points out, they rely on other factors, such as the seller’s brand, status in industry, and prior relationships. In other words, the buyer switches from assessing and comparing features and costs to differentiating based on the brand’s credibility and trustworthiness.

This is where I see many companies, especially software and professional services vendors, struggle. It appears to be especially painful for companies transitioning from providing a general set of enterprise IT tools and services and wanting to ride the momentum of new technologies such as cloud computing, big data and mobility, and apply them task-specific functions in vertical industries.

Establishing credibility in vertical markets can be difficult. The buyer’s functional leadership and the employees need to have trust in the vendor to have deep understanding of their process and appreciation of the subtleties of day to day operation.

So here are some suggestions:
Don’t

  • Don’t assume that your experience and tools can be easily transformed from one business segment to another. Some do; most don’t. Take the time to develop a detailed credible business case that you can deliver.
  • Don’t oversell technical wizardry. Buyers of enterprise software and services consider your product roadmap and long-term commitment to the space as much as they do to your product features and engineering skills.
  • Don’t try to prove industry knowledge and demonstrate empathy by highlighting the industry’s poor performance which you are going to turn around over night. Your audience already knows this all too well. Focus on the solutions.

Do

  • Develop deep expertise and position in your target industries and business functions. Not through “desk research” and generic stories, but rather by demonstrating successful implementations, publicizing customer case studies that are real, specific and credible, and becoming an industry insider.
  • Focus on establishing and nurturing long-term strategic relationships with your key customers.
  • Seek partnerships with systems integrators and service providers, especially in industries that are complex and narrowly focused, as these often have a culture that is difficult for outsiders to penetrate.

One last parting thought. The strategy you use to define and demonstrate your company’s differentiation to potential buyers is not necessarily the one you discuss with Wall Street and industry analysts.  This is a subject for a future blog post. In the interim, you can review another HBR article by Todd Zenger: Strategy: The Uniqueness Challenge.

Further Reading:

 

 

EMC: Large Enterprises Reduce Investments in Public Clouds

By Cloud Computing, IT Strategy No Comments

By 2016, Only 12% of Workload Will Run On Public
Cloud Infrastructure

This was the surprising perspective offered by Adrian McDonald, EMEA President at EMC, addressing the audience at EMC Forum 2013 that took place on November 4 in Tel Aviv, Israel. McDonald maintains that public cloud architecture is not the right solution for large enterprises, and, in fact, CIOs are reporting that when considering the investment in security, compliance and business continuity, public cloud infrastructure is more expensive than the alternatives.

According to McDonald, market research conducted by EMC shows that large organizations are gradually reducing application deployment on public clouds. EMC forecasts that by 2016, 12% of the workload will run on a public cloud and 12% will be using a private-virtual cloud, but 76% of the workload will require internally managed infrastructure.

McDonald estimates that organizations can cut as much as 38% of annual IT expenses through virtualization and cloud deployment. But he cautions that this is an aggressive goal that requires both IT organizations and cloud infrastructure and services providers to offer new ways to deliver flexible and agile solutions and services, such as supporting customer self-provisioning.

As reported by Ran Miron http://www.pc.co.il/?p=135820

HP and the Future of 3D Printing

By Additive Manufacturing, Mergers & Acquisitions 3 Comments

HP to Enter 3D Printing in 2014

On October 23, HP CEO Meg Whitman told the Canalys Channels Forum in Bangkok that HP plans to enter the 3D Printer market in the middle of 2014. HP plans to pursue ways to make 3D printing faster and cheaper, and while Whitman acknowledges that “3D printing is in its infancy”, she also sees great market opportunity for HP and is leading HP to ask “how do we commercialize to print faster, at lower price points? to enable service providers?”

Whitman believes, and many analysts agree, that 3-D printing is a natural extension of HP’s traditional 2D printing business. The logic is that as a longstanding market leader of 2D printers, printer inks and paper, HP can use its existing expertise, R&D resources and supply and distribution chains to innovate in 3D printing.

There is some merit to the analogy, as long as we keep it within the scope of where the concentration of 3D printing is today and will be in the near future: fabricating trinkets, fashion accessories, and small volume of specialized parts consumed primarily by small specialty manufacturers and hobbyists. This “makers” market is small, and Whitman acknowledges in her remarks that she did not expect 3D printing to become a big business quickly. Read More