Tag

GM Archives - Joe Barkai

Edison Baker Electric Car c. 1895

End of Tax Credit is Looming: Implications for Electric Vehicle Manufacturers

By Automotive, Autonomous, Connected, Electric, Shared Vehicles One Comment

Did you put down money for a new bright red Tesla Model 3? (Or did you skimp and got the standard any-color-so-long-as-it-is-black car?)

Tesla’s Model 3 order book backlog has been growing longer. The company has confirmed having about 420,000 Model 3 reservations, which, at the current production rate, will take nearly two years to deliver. Tesla has been struggling for more than a year to ramp up manufacturing to meet the demand. The company is targeting production rate of 6,000 per week, which is a significant improvement, albeit still only about 65% of the factory’s capacity when it was co-owned by General Motors and Toyota.

To accelerate production, Tesla reduced the number of available Model 3 configurations from thousands to about 100, which means you will not be able to get the exact car of your dreams. And by the time your car is ready to be delivered to you, the federal tax incentive you were counting on may be gone. Read More

Crystal Ball Predictions

Three Connected Car Questions

By Automotive, Autonomous, Connected, Electric, Shared Vehicles, Telematics No Comments

Three Connected Car Questions for 2016

Q: Will autonomous cars be available in 2016?

No, they won’t. Automakers are making steady progress in autonomous navigation and driving technologies, and some of the building blocks are being gradually introduced in new cars. We will see advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) technologies offered in a growing number of cars in the form of automatic emergency braking, adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assistance and self-parking.

But it’s unlikely that self-driving cars will be roaming our streets for at least another 5 years. By 2020 we might see low speed self-driving cars or people-moving pods in limited-use applications such as company campuses, airport transfer services and retirement communities. Establishing dedicated paths or highway lanes for autonomous vehicles will accelerate the adoption and utilization of driverless cars.

Q: Will Google build an autonomous car?

Read More

Can Driverless Cars Make Ethical Decisions?

By Automotive, Autonomous, Connected, Electric, Shared Vehicles 2 Comments

Fully autonomous driverless cars may be in the future, but the vision is getting more vivid by the day. Great progress is being made in demonstrating autonomous car capabilities and enacting legislation to allow road testing, improving autonomous driving capabilities and inspire consumer confidence and acceptance of new mobility models.

But before autonomous cars are available at your local dealership or can be summoned from your smartphone app, there’s a number of significant hurdles that industry and governments need to overcome.  The purpose of this short article is not to contest the viability of autonomous cars, but rather to highlight some of the interesting and difficult problems engineers, legislatures, and ethicists (yes, ethicists; this is not a typo) are working on.

Human Behavior and Interaction

Mary Bara, GM’s CEOs said in a recent interview:  “I can put autonomous car out now, but the streets of New York are a great example [of the challenges]: the jogger, the dog, the baby carriage.” Recognizing static obstacles and even humans and small animals crossing the road is likely to improve considerably in the near future.

However, recognizing and responding to the complex and tacit interaction between drivers, cyclists and pedestrians will be much more difficult. For example, a police officer signaling for traffic to stop to allow pedestrian to cross the street. A driverless car doesn’t recognize the signal and proceeds through a green light but is unable to stop in time when the pedestrian steps into its path.

Weather

Daytime driving in the perfectly clear weather of California and Nevada doesn’t represent the average conditions autonomous vehicles will face in most other regions. Cars will have to be able to follow traffic lanes in snow covered roads, evade ice patches and potholes (I live in Boston!), and quickly recover when blinded by the sun.

Ethics

Making the right choice when there are conflicting objectives and restrictions is extremely difficult for advanced artificial intelligence based systems. The autonomous driving system is designed to obey the traffic rules, but will it be able to “break the law” to avoid hitting a pedestrian?

In fact, even if driverless cars eventually do possess advanced “moral judgment”, will all autonomous cars made by highly competitive OEMs employ identical decision “ethics” and collision avoidance strategies, or are they likely to make opposing decisions and stop in their track instead of evading each other?

Law and Liability

Issues surrounding accountability for damage caused by an autonomous and possibly even driver-assistant driving are only beginning to emerge. For instance, if a car’s software performed as advertised, but failed to prevent an accident, is the carmaker responsible for the damage?  Will we see a wave of drivers arguing that the car’s software failed to provide adequate lane departure or blind spot warning?

As GM’s Bara acknowledged: “[it’s a] huge responsibility whether you are steering or not.”

Cost and Critical Mass

Even as technology improves and consumer doubts eventually abate, the additional cost of sensor and computing technologies may prevent autonomous cars from being affordable by the mainstream for a long time. Of course, the cost will improve dramatically when autonomous cars enter volume production, but this will not happen until consumer acceptance is high enough.

This is a chicken-and-egg problem because the full potential of autonomous vehicles, and connected cars in general, will not be realized until the number of such vehicles reaches a critical mass. But reaching this point will require that enough consumers buy into advanced connected car and autonomous driving technologies.

Survey: Are Drivers Ready to Trust Driverless Cars?

By Automotive, Autonomous, Connected, Electric, Shared Vehicles, Telematics No Comments

A recent study commissioned by carInsurance.com found that most Americans would not give up Driverless Cars Survey 1driving even if autonomous cars were available today. While one fifth of the 2,000 licensed drivers surveyed said they would gladly turn over the keys, most still have concerns about the skills and capabilities of a computerized chauffeur.

The distrust in autonomous driving technology does not seem to waver despite the frequent headlines that showcase Google’s self-driving cars and Tesla’s highly computerized electric cars. The drivers responding to this survey prefer to be sitting in a driverless car made by one of the traditional OEMs like Ford, GM or Toyota: with or without a human drive, it’s still a motor vehicle.Driverless Cars Survey 2

These data points show that even if driverless cars were available today, the convenience of autonomous driving isn’t going to be enough to overcome the technological concerns of the general public. However, when presented with the option of significantly lower insurance rates for autonomous – and safer – cars, those surveyed had a change of heart. More than a third of drivers said an 80% discount on car insurance rates would make purchase of an autonomous vehicle “very likely,” and 90% said they would at least consider the idea.

Now the question is: what will those ex-drivers do with the additional free time? Not, much, it seems. Driverless Cars Survey 3More than a quarter will text or talk with friends and 10% will just sleep.  Only 7% will use the time to work.

 

 

GM’s Electric Vehicle Strategy: Stuck Between Toyota and Tesla

By Automotive, Autonomous, Connected, Electric, Shared Vehicles, Manufacturing No Comments

Although sales of electric vehicle in the U.S. in 2012 were much stronger  than in the previous year, they were barely noticeable, accounting for less EV Sales 2012than 0.5% of the 14.5 million cars and light duty trucks sold during the year. With some exceptions, public interest in owning EVs, seems to be dwindling.

A few years ago, General Motors decided to bet on electric propulsion as part of its recovery strategy, in part perhaps because worldwide sales of EVs, especially in China, are expected to grow over the next decade. GM elected to enter the market with the Chevy badge, targeting the demographic of market leader Toyota Prius, and planning to leverage the  global presence of Chevy in future high demand markets.

Bob Lutz, the former GM Vice Chairman who led the development of the Volt often referred to the Volt as the most important product for GM. The Volt was brought to market in only two years, which is record time for a car with that level of technology innovation. Perhaps Lutz’s promise to finally retire once the Volt has been launched had something to do with it?

The Volt’s sales, while strong, are still well below GM’s expectations and far from being able to make a meaningful dent in the dominance of Toyota’s Prius. Trying to catch up, GM  recently cut the price of the 2013 Chevrolet Volt by $4,000 and nearly doubled the production capacity of the Volt production line. But Toyota’s vehicles, including Prius and other hybrids, and the recently announced plug-in hybrid (PHEV), continue to dominate the market in the U.S.

So GM is signaling a change in tack and going to offer an extended range electric Cadillac, the ELR, presumably to attract more affluent buyers that perhaps prefer the luxary image of Cadillac. At the time, Lutz objected to it because of the lack of brand appeal outside of North America.

The problem with this strategy is that it positions the ELR awkwardly between the popular Toyota Prius and the media darling Tesla Model S, but with hardly enough reason for anyone to switch brands. A low cost Cadillac priced to compete with the Prius will also compete with the Volt, diluting the value of both badges and of the entire portfolio. GM is obviously delighted with the success of the rejuvenated Cadillac brand, but using it to save GM’s EV strategy isn’t such a good idea.

GM has to figure out how to deal with the growing strength of Tesla. Although Tesla sold less than 5,000 vehicles in 2012, it reported a 13,000 unit backlog and has the manufacturing capacity, presumably 20,000 units per year, to deliver it. The growth in Tesla’s market share will come from the same segment GM targets the ELR for.

However, GM has several advantages and opportunities to compete against Tesla’s cars thanks to its retail and service network, and the practicality of the range extending gasoline engine.

Tesla has to clear a number of hurdles before it can reach  profitable market adoption outside the high income urban demographics.  Currently, the company does not have retail and service network. Recently, Tesla recalled Model S cars manufactured between May 10 and June 8. The campaign required driving to a customer location to pick up the vehicle and to deliver it after the repair work. The company is also in an ongoing battle with NADA, franchised car dealers and state regulators to allow it to sell direct to consumers.

Also, despite Tesla’s ongoing efforts to build up its charging infrastructure, the practicality of the Model S outside these urban areas is still limited. Both the ELR and the Volt have a longer  practical driving range that the Model S, because they can revert to gasoline when needed. The Model S can reach 300 miles with the largest capacity battery available. This means you can go only 150 miles or so before you have to turn back. The Volt can travel only 40 miles on a single charge, but with the auxiliary gasoline engine it can reach 300 miles although, obviously, the performance under gasoline engine compared to the Model S will be quite anemic.

GM should use the range advantage, coupled with its service network and the lower sticker price to drive sales and establish stronger brand presence, while Tesla is fighting court battles and building the charging infrastructure. The Tesla brand will no doubt continue to attract certain demographics, but the bigger market will go to the Volt.

As for the Prius PHEV, it looks like with its puny 4.4 kW/hr battery which gives it a meager 6 mile range, it may not be able to limp to the starting line.